Bonjour,

Sinon un bon "M3 - M6 - M7" fera le même boulot (même mieux pour moi) et pour... 6 - 8 fois moins cher...........
N.

Tant qu'à aller dans l'argentique autant prendre un boitier MF si tu veux aller par là...

Après, qualitativement parlant, le MM va plus loin, sans filtre de bayer c'est pas la même.

Those who have read my review of the M Monochrom will know that I was very enamoured of this camera’s tonality: it produces very rich, dense results that are difficult to replicate with a non-CCD sensor. The D800E can do it, but it requires a significant amount of photoshop work to achieve. The M 240′s native tonal response is somewhere between a CMOS and CCD, which I think gives us the best of both worlds. I found the files very easy to process into tonally rich, pleasing black and white images; in fact, not that different to the Monochrom. Granted, the M 240 doesn’t have the same resolution – it still has a Bayer filter, and the 6MP increase in resolution isn’t really enough to overcome the Monochrom’s advantage – but for the majority of applications, it’s pretty close.

I’d say the M 240 makes for a much more flexible solution than a Monochrom, however, if you’re going to be making very large prints, then the Monochrom still holds a noticeable resolution advantage.